https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350723 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner, dismissing the Revenue's appeal due to the lack of suppression of facts by the respondent and the settled interpretation of law regarding the valuation of physician samples. The Tribunal found no dispute on the duty demand, admitted by the respondent, and upheld the impugned order based on the debatable nature of the issue with conflicting decisions during the relevant period. The Tribunal emphasized the bonafide belief of the respondent and referenced the settled interpretation of law in the case of Indian Drugs Manufacturers Assocn. en-us Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Dec 2017 12:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350723 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner, dismissing the Revenue's appeal due to the lack of suppression of facts by the respondent and the settled interpretation of law regarding the valuation of physician samples. The Tribunal found no dispute on the duty demand, admitted by the respondent, and upheld the impugned order based on the debatable nature of the issue with conflicting decisions during the relevant period. The Tribunal emphasized the bonafide belief of the respondent and referenced the settled interpretation of law in the case of Indian Drugs Manufacturers Assocn. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350723