https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350720 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Bagasse is not dutiable, and the reversal of Cenvat credit under Rule 6(3) was a revenue deposit, not subject to time-bar limitations. The appellant's refund claim for the period April 2010 to August 2012 was accepted, and the impugned order rejecting the refund application was set aside. The appellant was directed to receive the refund along with applicable interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act within 45 days. en-us Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350720 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Bagasse is not dutiable, and the reversal of Cenvat credit under Rule 6(3) was a revenue deposit, not subject to time-bar limitations. The appellant's refund claim for the period April 2010 to August 2012 was accepted, and the impugned order rejecting the refund application was set aside. The appellant was directed to receive the refund along with applicable interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act within 45 days. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350720