https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350715 Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit was held admissible where inputs were used in goods cleared to a 100% EOU under CT-3 certificates and treated as deemed export; the credit could not be denied merely because the clearances were to an EOU. The limitation objection to one quarterly refund claim also failed, because the filing period was to be computed with reference to the end of the relevant quarter, making the claim filed on 28.03.2007 within time. Refund was therefore directed to be granted with interest in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Nov 2017 18:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350715 Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit was held admissible where inputs were used in goods cleared to a 100% EOU under CT-3 certificates and treated as deemed export; the credit could not be denied merely because the clearances were to an EOU. The limitation objection to one quarterly refund claim also failed, because the filing period was to be computed with reference to the end of the relevant quarter, making the claim filed on 28.03.2007 within time. Refund was therefore directed to be granted with interest in accordance with law. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350715