https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195811 Article notes that writ petitions were held maintainable against interlocutory orders of a statutory tribunal under the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act because no statutory appeal lay and the availability of revision did not bar Article 226 relief. It further records that the election rules governing issuance and communication of whip and form-B were treated as mandatory, requiring strict compliance. On the facts, the court found prima facie non-compliance, misreading of evidence, reliance on irrelevant newspaper reports, and an improper burden placed on the petitioner, amounting to perversity and error apparent on the record. The disqualification orders were quashed and kept in abeyance pending final decision in the election petitions. en-us Sun, 07 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:51:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195811 Article notes that writ petitions were held maintainable against interlocutory orders of a statutory tribunal under the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act because no statutory appeal lay and the availability of revision did not bar Article 226 relief. It further records that the election rules governing issuance and communication of whip and form-B were treated as mandatory, requiring strict compliance. On the facts, the court found prima facie non-compliance, misreading of evidence, reliance on irrelevant newspaper reports, and an improper burden placed on the petitioner, amounting to perversity and error apparent on the record. The disqualification orders were quashed and kept in abeyance pending final decision in the election petitions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sun, 07 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195811