<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1135 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195818</link>
    <description>In NDPS prosecutions, in-court identification may sustain conviction even without a test identification parade where witnesses had a sufficient opportunity to see the accused and their evidence remains credible. Conscious possession can be inferred from custody, dominion, control and surrounding conduct, including presence in a truck carrying contraband and flight from the scene. Section 50 applies only to personal search and does not extend to search of a vehicle, so its non-compliance does not vitiate recovery from a truck. The prosecution case was not rejected merely because independent witnesses were not examined, as trustworthy official evidence was sufficient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:51:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1135 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195818</link>
      <description>In NDPS prosecutions, in-court identification may sustain conviction even without a test identification parade where witnesses had a sufficient opportunity to see the accused and their evidence remains credible. Conscious possession can be inferred from custody, dominion, control and surrounding conduct, including presence in a truck carrying contraband and flight from the scene. Section 50 applies only to personal search and does not extend to search of a vehicle, so its non-compliance does not vitiate recovery from a truck. The prosecution case was not rejected merely because independent witnesses were not examined, as trustworthy official evidence was sufficient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>