<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 63 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10533</link>
    <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete an addition of Rs. 1,54,236 from the income of a Hindu undivided family for the assessment year 1975-76. The court found the Tribunal&#039;s decision well-founded, supported by evidence, and not legally flawed. The Tribunal had valid reasons for accepting the ownership claim made by a family member regarding conflicting ownership of ornaments discovered during a search and seizure operation. The judgment favored the assessee, ruling against the Revenue and emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s proper evaluation of evidence. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 63 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10533</link>
      <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete an addition of Rs. 1,54,236 from the income of a Hindu undivided family for the assessment year 1975-76. The court found the Tribunal&#039;s decision well-founded, supported by evidence, and not legally flawed. The Tribunal had valid reasons for accepting the ownership claim made by a family member regarding conflicting ownership of ornaments discovered during a search and seizure operation. The judgment favored the assessee, ruling against the Revenue and emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s proper evaluation of evidence. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>