<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1133 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195799</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the case but allowed the petitioners to file a Review Petition before the High Court if certain facts were not adequately considered. The High Court was directed to hear both parties and consider the petition in accordance with the law. The Supreme Court did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:04:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1133 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195799</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the case but allowed the petitioners to file a Review Petition before the High Court if certain facts were not adequately considered. The High Court was directed to hear both parties and consider the petition in accordance with the law. The Supreme Court did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>