<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Recovery of Demand by the ITO in case of Appeal Preferred against order.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113032</link>
    <description>Assessing Officer sought recovery of an additional deposit by treating interest as part of the base for the 15% deposit, and attached the assessee&#039;s bank account; while an appeal against the order is pending the AO should not press outstanding recovery without a stay. The recommended remedies are to apply for a stay before the appellate authority or to challenge the recovery by filing a writ petition in the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 16:45:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Recovery of Demand by the ITO in case of Appeal Preferred against order.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113032</link>
      <description>Assessing Officer sought recovery of an additional deposit by treating interest as part of the base for the 15% deposit, and attached the assessee&#039;s bank account; while an appeal against the order is pending the AO should not press outstanding recovery without a stay. The recommended remedies are to apply for a stay before the appellate authority or to challenge the recovery by filing a writ petition in the High Court.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 16:45:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>