https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195791 The Supreme Court declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 and did not interfere with the impugned order, resulting in dismissal of the special leave petition. At the same time, it directed the Director General of Civil Aviation to consider any request by the petitioner for implementation of the Division Bench order of the High Court and to pass an appropriate order expeditiously, without unnecessary delay. The order thus leaves the High Court decision undisturbed while requiring prompt administrative consideration of compliance. en-us Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:29:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195791 The Supreme Court declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 and did not interfere with the impugned order, resulting in dismissal of the special leave petition. At the same time, it directed the Director General of Civil Aviation to consider any request by the petitioner for implementation of the Division Bench order of the High Court and to pass an appropriate order expeditiously, without unnecessary delay. The order thus leaves the High Court decision undisturbed while requiring prompt administrative consideration of compliance. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195791