https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195790 The court upheld the decision of the learned Single Judge directing the DGCA to de-register the aircraft in question, emphasizing that while DRI's instructions are not binding, they should be considered by DGCA in its decision-making process. The court modified the order, requiring DGCA to make a reasoned decision on the de-registration request in compliance with the law, allowing the concerned parties to submit written arguments. The appellant, DRI, was granted the freedom to pursue actions related to the alleged customs duty evasion. en-us Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:26:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195790 The court upheld the decision of the learned Single Judge directing the DGCA to de-register the aircraft in question, emphasizing that while DRI's instructions are not binding, they should be considered by DGCA in its decision-making process. The court modified the order, requiring DGCA to make a reasoned decision on the de-registration request in compliance with the law, allowing the concerned parties to submit written arguments. The appellant, DRI, was granted the freedom to pursue actions related to the alleged customs duty evasion. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195790