<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 65 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10527</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that no penalty could be imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act if the concealed income did not result in a liability for income tax. The Court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that tax would be chargeable on the concealed income exceeding the total income assessed. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that no substantial legal question was raised, and the appeal lacked merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 65 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10527</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that no penalty could be imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act if the concealed income did not result in a liability for income tax. The Court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that tax would be chargeable on the concealed income exceeding the total income assessed. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that no substantial legal question was raised, and the appeal lacked merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>