<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 576 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350697</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the department. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deemed unjustified as the tribunal found the transactions to be genuine, supported by valid documentation and banking records. The court concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support the AO&#039;s claims, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 576 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350697</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the department. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deemed unjustified as the tribunal found the transactions to be genuine, supported by valid documentation and banking records. The court concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support the AO&#039;s claims, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>