<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 569 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350690</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeals on various issues, including the validity of the notice served under section 148 within the prescribed time frame and the disallowance of loss in trading of Mustard. The court relied on legal precedents and the department&#039;s actions, concluding in favor of the department and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:22:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 569 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350690</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeals on various issues, including the validity of the notice served under section 148 within the prescribed time frame and the disallowance of loss in trading of Mustard. The court relied on legal precedents and the department&#039;s actions, concluding in favor of the department and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>