<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 560 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350681</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the assessee&#039;s activities are charitable and eligible for exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that receiving sponsorship and royalty income does not change the charitable nature of the organization, emphasizing that the primary object of promoting basketball is charitable. The decision upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order and was pronounced on 21/08/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:22:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 560 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350681</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the assessee&#039;s activities are charitable and eligible for exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that receiving sponsorship and royalty income does not change the charitable nature of the organization, emphasizing that the primary object of promoting basketball is charitable. The decision upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order and was pronounced on 21/08/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>