https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350663 The Tribunal set aside the order refraining from decision due to lack of a speaking order by authorities below and remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on its merits. The rejection of input service distributor registration was deemed appealable, and the impugned order was set aside for a decision on the appeal on its merits. The Tribunal held that the rejection letter was indeed an appealable order, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal following principles of natural justice and by passing a reasoned order. en-us Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:35:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350663 The Tribunal set aside the order refraining from decision due to lack of a speaking order by authorities below and remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on its merits. The rejection of input service distributor registration was deemed appealable, and the impugned order was set aside for a decision on the appeal on its merits. The Tribunal held that the rejection letter was indeed an appealable order, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal following principles of natural justice and by passing a reasoned order. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350663