<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 537 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350658</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the interpretation of &quot;Support services of business or commerce&quot; under Section 65(104c) of the Finance Act, 1994 for service tax liability on renting equipment. The appellant&#039;s activity of providing equipment on rent without involvement in the client&#039;s business operations was deemed not to fall under the taxable category of Business Support Service (BSS). The Tribunal concluded that the service tax demand could not be sustained as the appellant&#039;s actions did not constitute providing infrastructural support services, ultimately setting aside the tax demand in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:35:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 537 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350658</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the interpretation of &quot;Support services of business or commerce&quot; under Section 65(104c) of the Finance Act, 1994 for service tax liability on renting equipment. The appellant&#039;s activity of providing equipment on rent without involvement in the client&#039;s business operations was deemed not to fall under the taxable category of Business Support Service (BSS). The Tribunal concluded that the service tax demand could not be sustained as the appellant&#039;s actions did not constitute providing infrastructural support services, ultimately setting aside the tax demand in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>