<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Confirms CESTAT Decision Dropping CENVAT Credit Demand for Common Inputs u/s 11A and Rule 6, 12.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36814</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit - Whether CESTAT is correct in dropping demand of Cenvat Credit on common inputs issued u/sn 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rule 6 &amp; 12 of erstwhile CCR, 2002 for having not maintained separate accounts as mandated statutorily by law? - Held Yes - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:21:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:21:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Confirms CESTAT Decision Dropping CENVAT Credit Demand for Common Inputs u/s 11A and Rule 6, 12.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36814</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit - Whether CESTAT is correct in dropping demand of Cenvat Credit on common inputs issued u/sn 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rule 6 &amp; 12 of erstwhile CCR, 2002 for having not maintained separate accounts as mandated statutorily by law? - Held Yes - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:21:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>