<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 58 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10519</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that crates and bottles are entitled to 100% depreciation based on precedents and emphasized simplicity in interpretation. Regarding the taxability of security deposits, the court ruled that they were not taxable income as they did not form part of the sale transaction, aligning with previous judgments. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was found, concluding the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 58 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10519</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that crates and bottles are entitled to 100% depreciation based on precedents and emphasized simplicity in interpretation. Regarding the taxability of security deposits, the court ruled that they were not taxable income as they did not form part of the sale transaction, aligning with previous judgments. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was found, concluding the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>