<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 66 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10518</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the annual letting value of a godown owned by the assessee and used for business carried on by him in partnership should be exempt from inclusion in his total income under section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that a firm is not a legal entity but an association of individuals, and partners are co-owners in the firm&#039;s property. The judgment diverged from the Karnataka High Court&#039;s strict interpretation, affirming that the firm-occupied property qualified for exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 66 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10518</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the annual letting value of a godown owned by the assessee and used for business carried on by him in partnership should be exempt from inclusion in his total income under section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that a firm is not a legal entity but an association of individuals, and partners are co-owners in the firm&#039;s property. The judgment diverged from the Karnataka High Court&#039;s strict interpretation, affirming that the firm-occupied property qualified for exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>