<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1253 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195768</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to exclude certain companies from the list of comparables and include others after due verification. The addition made under Section 14A was deleted due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to record satisfaction and justify the rejection of the assessee&#039;s disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:09:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1253 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195768</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to exclude certain companies from the list of comparables and include others after due verification. The addition made under Section 14A was deleted due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to record satisfaction and justify the rejection of the assessee&#039;s disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>