https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350647 The appeal was partly allowed, directing the exclusion of certain companies from the final set of comparables in both the ITS and ITES segments. Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Ltd. was included as a comparable, and the application of the +/- 5% range under Section 92C(2) of the Act was mandated. The appeal on the computation of interest liability under Section 234B was dismissed as the interest levy was deemed mandatory and consequential. en-us Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:09:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350647 The appeal was partly allowed, directing the exclusion of certain companies from the final set of comparables in both the ITS and ITES segments. Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Ltd. was included as a comparable, and the application of the +/- 5% range under Section 92C(2) of the Act was mandated. The appeal on the computation of interest liability under Section 234B was dismissed as the interest levy was deemed mandatory and consequential. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350647