<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 791 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195760</link>
    <description>Revenue appeals were barred where the tax effect fell below the monetary limit prescribed in Instruction No. 3/2011, and the instruction was treated as applicable to pending proceedings as well. On that basis, the High Court held that the appeal could not be entertained for want of maintainability. The result was dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 791 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195760</link>
      <description>Revenue appeals were barred where the tax effect fell below the monetary limit prescribed in Instruction No. 3/2011, and the instruction was treated as applicable to pending proceedings as well. On that basis, the High Court held that the appeal could not be entertained for want of maintainability. The result was dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>