<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1909 (3) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195759</link>
    <description>An appeal against a preliminary decree in a partition suit was held incompetent after a final decree had already been passed without challenge. The Court applied the principle that the right to appeal from interlocutory orders ends with disposal of the suit, and treated it as equally applicable where the suit proceeds from preliminary decree to final decree. As the final decree was not appealed, relief against the preliminary decree alone would have been ineffective and would indirectly unsettle an unchallenged final decree. The appellant&#039;s failure to challenge the final decree was therefore fatal to maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 1909 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1909 (3) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195759</link>
      <description>An appeal against a preliminary decree in a partition suit was held incompetent after a final decree had already been passed without challenge. The Court applied the principle that the right to appeal from interlocutory orders ends with disposal of the suit, and treated it as equally applicable where the suit proceeds from preliminary decree to final decree. As the final decree was not appealed, relief against the preliminary decree alone would have been ineffective and would indirectly unsettle an unchallenged final decree. The appellant&#039;s failure to challenge the final decree was therefore fatal to maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 1909 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>