<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1927 (7) TMI 3 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195758</link>
    <description>An appeal against an order of remand is not maintainable where the appellant accepts the remand, participates in the retrial on the merits, and then allows the decree passed after retrial to stand without appealing it. The court applied the settled principle that a party must elect either to accept or repudiate the remand order; by contesting the suit again without protest, the appellant was treated as having accepted the remand. Section 105(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 did not change that rule, so a later separate challenge to the remand was barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:05:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1927 (7) TMI 3 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195758</link>
      <description>An appeal against an order of remand is not maintainable where the appellant accepts the remand, participates in the retrial on the merits, and then allows the decree passed after retrial to stand without appealing it. The court applied the settled principle that a party must elect either to accept or repudiate the remand order; by contesting the suit again without protest, the appellant was treated as having accepted the remand. Section 105(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 did not change that rule, so a later separate challenge to the remand was barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>