<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 856 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195756</link>
    <description>The regulatory fee framework required SEBI registration fee to be computed on actual turnover breakup under clause (bb), and the text states that a circular could not substitute gross-turnover computation merely because breakup data was filed late. It also states that, where revised turnover data was produced within the regularisation period and the initial shortfall arose from the stock exchange&#039;s compilation process, rigid refusal to accept corrected data was unreasonable. The described consequence was acceptance of revised data, recomputation of fee liability, revision of fee statements, and credit for payments already made, while future defaults remained subject to the regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:56:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 856 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195756</link>
      <description>The regulatory fee framework required SEBI registration fee to be computed on actual turnover breakup under clause (bb), and the text states that a circular could not substitute gross-turnover computation merely because breakup data was filed late. It also states that, where revised turnover data was produced within the regularisation period and the initial shortfall arose from the stock exchange&#039;s compilation process, rigid refusal to accept corrected data was unreasonable. The described consequence was acceptance of revised data, recomputation of fee liability, revision of fee statements, and credit for payments already made, while future defaults remained subject to the regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>