<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1172 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195752</link>
    <description>Substantial compliance with NDPS search and reporting safeguards was treated as sufficient where information was acted on immediately, a wireless message was sent to a superior officer, and the recovery details were forwarded through the Ruqa and FIR process; section 57 was described as non-mandatory and no prejudice to the accused was shown. Recovery of contraband from a locked room in the petitioner&#039;s premises, opened with a key in his possession, was treated as establishing conscious possession through control and knowledge. On that basis, the conviction and sentence were stated to be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:50:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1172 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195752</link>
      <description>Substantial compliance with NDPS search and reporting safeguards was treated as sufficient where information was acted on immediately, a wireless message was sent to a superior officer, and the recovery details were forwarded through the Ruqa and FIR process; section 57 was described as non-mandatory and no prejudice to the accused was shown. Recovery of contraband from a locked room in the petitioner&#039;s premises, opened with a key in his possession, was treated as establishing conscious possession through control and knowledge. On that basis, the conviction and sentence were stated to be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>