<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 548 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195751</link>
    <description>Credible police testimony can sustain a conviction even without independent corroboration where the evidence is consistent and unimpeached. The expiry of TADA did not nullify the notified area or defeat proceedings already initiated under Section 5, as the notification had not been denotified. Conscious possession of an unlicensed firearm in a notified area was sufficient to attract Section 5, and proof of a direct link to terrorist activity was unnecessary. On these principles, the conviction and sentence were affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:38:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 548 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195751</link>
      <description>Credible police testimony can sustain a conviction even without independent corroboration where the evidence is consistent and unimpeached. The expiry of TADA did not nullify the notified area or defeat proceedings already initiated under Section 5, as the notification had not been denotified. Conscious possession of an unlicensed firearm in a notified area was sufficient to attract Section 5, and proof of a direct link to terrorist activity was unnecessary. On these principles, the conviction and sentence were affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>