https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195726 The High Court of Bombay addressed the issue of prosecuting a director or employee of a company for an offense under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act without involving the company as an accused. Relying on the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Aneeta Hada vs. Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt. Ltd., the court ruled that the company must be arraigned as an accused to maintain a prosecution under section 141 of the Act. The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the proceedings against the petitioner, and canceled any existing bail bond, applying the Supreme Court judgment to ensure justice and adherence to legal principles. en-us Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Nov 2017 10:06:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195726 The High Court of Bombay addressed the issue of prosecuting a director or employee of a company for an offense under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act without involving the company as an accused. Relying on the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Aneeta Hada vs. Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt. Ltd., the court ruled that the company must be arraigned as an accused to maintain a prosecution under section 141 of the Act. The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the proceedings against the petitioner, and canceled any existing bail bond, applying the Supreme Court judgment to ensure justice and adherence to legal principles. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195726