https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195730 The Court corrected a transcription error in a court order concerning the service of notice for a petition under Section 394 A of the Companies Act, 1956. The error involved including the Official Liquidator in addition to the Regional Director for notice service, which was deemed incorrect. The Court rectified the error, directing that notice should only be served on the Regional Director. This case emphasizes the importance of accuracy in court orders, prompt correction of errors, and adherence to procedural requirements, ensuring legal documents reflect accurate instructions and upholding the integrity of legal proceedings. en-us Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Nov 2017 10:06:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195730 The Court corrected a transcription error in a court order concerning the service of notice for a petition under Section 394 A of the Companies Act, 1956. The error involved including the Official Liquidator in addition to the Regional Director for notice service, which was deemed incorrect. The Court rectified the error, directing that notice should only be served on the Regional Director. This case emphasizes the importance of accuracy in court orders, prompt correction of errors, and adherence to procedural requirements, ensuring legal documents reflect accurate instructions and upholding the integrity of legal proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195730