<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 70 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10509</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under section 43B(a) for an assessee involved in manufacturing and selling chappal sheets and hawai chappals. The Court emphasized the importance of timely payments for statutory liabilities and clarified the legislative intent behind section 43B. Relying on precedents and legal principles, including a Supreme Court-approved judgment, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting the need to interpret section 43B(a), the first proviso, and Explanation 2 together. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the legal framework, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 70 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10509</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under section 43B(a) for an assessee involved in manufacturing and selling chappal sheets and hawai chappals. The Court emphasized the importance of timely payments for statutory liabilities and clarified the legislative intent behind section 43B. Relying on precedents and legal principles, including a Supreme Court-approved judgment, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting the need to interpret section 43B(a), the first proviso, and Explanation 2 together. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the legal framework, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>