https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10508 The Division Bench remitted the matter back for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Juggilal Kamlapat Bankers v. WTO [1984] 145 ITR 485, emphasizing the significance of rule 2B(2) in determining asset values for wealth tax purposes. The court directed prompt resolution of pending applications, stressing adherence to the principles established in the Supreme Court decision. en-us Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10508 The Division Bench remitted the matter back for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Juggilal Kamlapat Bankers v. WTO [1984] 145 ITR 485, emphasizing the significance of rule 2B(2) in determining asset values for wealth tax purposes. The court directed prompt resolution of pending applications, stressing adherence to the principles established in the Supreme Court decision. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10508