<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 522 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350643</link>
    <description>Contribution transferred to the reserve fund under cooperative law was treated as part of the society&#039;s own assets and retained for its own purposes, so it was neither diverted by an overriding title nor excluded on a real income basis. On that reasoning, the amount was not allowable as a deduction in computing taxable business income. The Court also held that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 522 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350643</link>
      <description>Contribution transferred to the reserve fund under cooperative law was treated as part of the society&#039;s own assets and retained for its own purposes, so it was neither diverted by an overriding title nor excluded on a real income basis. On that reasoning, the amount was not allowable as a deduction in computing taxable business income. The Court also held that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>