<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 498 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350619</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 17,22,132/- under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessee provided evidence that the purchases were made through account payee cheques using sale proceeds. The ITAT found the CIT(A) failed to identify any errors in the reconciliation of purchases and sales, concluding that the addition was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 08:11:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 498 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350619</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 17,22,132/- under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessee provided evidence that the purchases were made through account payee cheques using sale proceeds. The ITAT found the CIT(A) failed to identify any errors in the reconciliation of purchases and sales, concluding that the addition was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>