<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 494 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350615</link>
    <description>The court held that Notification No. 17 of 2009 could not be applied retrospectively, with the condition being effective only from 19.02.2009 onwards. The retrospective imposition of additional duty and interest was set aside, and the related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 494 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350615</link>
      <description>The court held that Notification No. 17 of 2009 could not be applied retrospectively, with the condition being effective only from 19.02.2009 onwards. The retrospective imposition of additional duty and interest was set aside, and the related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>