https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350601 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax demand and penalties imposed. It was found that the show cause notice lacked proper substantiation regarding intentional contravention or fraud to evade tax, barring part of the demand by limitation of time. The matter was remanded for re-quantification within the normal period of limitation, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling statutory obligations and limitations on invoking the extended period for service tax demands. en-us Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Nov 2017 08:08:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350601 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax demand and penalties imposed. It was found that the show cause notice lacked proper substantiation regarding intentional contravention or fraud to evade tax, barring part of the demand by limitation of time. The matter was remanded for re-quantification within the normal period of limitation, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling statutory obligations and limitations on invoking the extended period for service tax demands. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350601