<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 469 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350590</link>
    <description>The appellant was allowed to avail cenvat credit on imported inputs despite countervailing duty being deducted in the DEPB passbook. The Court held that the appellant could claim the credit regardless of the policy under which the DEPB was issued. The judgment emphasized the consistent interpretation by various High Courts on this issue, setting aside the impugned order and ruling in favor of the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the cenvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 08:08:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 469 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350590</link>
      <description>The appellant was allowed to avail cenvat credit on imported inputs despite countervailing duty being deducted in the DEPB passbook. The Court held that the appellant could claim the credit regardless of the policy under which the DEPB was issued. The judgment emphasized the consistent interpretation by various High Courts on this issue, setting aside the impugned order and ruling in favor of the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the cenvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>