<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 64 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10501</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the interest charged under section 217 of the Income-tax Act. It clarified the obligations related to advance tax statements, emphasizing the need for a tax liability to necessitate filing such statements. The judgment highlighted the requirement of a legal right to interest based on commercial principles, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s claim for interest due to the absence of a tax entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 64 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10501</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the interest charged under section 217 of the Income-tax Act. It clarified the obligations related to advance tax statements, emphasizing the need for a tax liability to necessitate filing such statements. The judgment highlighted the requirement of a legal right to interest based on commercial principles, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s claim for interest due to the absence of a tax entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>