<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 723 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195717</link>
    <description>At the stage of Section 319 CrPC proceedings, the court must assess the prosecution evidence on record to determine whether it discloses sufficient ground to proceed against a proposed additional accused. Statements of the complainant and injured witnesses specifically implicated the persons sought to be added, and the injury reports supported the prosecution version with multiple firearm injuries. The court could not rely on the defence of an already tried accused or treat that objection as a basis to refuse summoning. On that material, rejection of the application was unsustainable and the proposed accused could be summoned to face trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:56:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 723 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195717</link>
      <description>At the stage of Section 319 CrPC proceedings, the court must assess the prosecution evidence on record to determine whether it discloses sufficient ground to proceed against a proposed additional accused. Statements of the complainant and injured witnesses specifically implicated the persons sought to be added, and the injury reports supported the prosecution version with multiple firearm injuries. The court could not rely on the defence of an already tried accused or treat that objection as a basis to refuse summoning. On that material, rejection of the application was unsustainable and the proposed accused could be summoned to face trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>