https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195714 Blast furnace gas cleared without payment of duty under an exemption notification was the subject of the dispute while the assessee was availing CENVAT credit. The Revenue sought to recover an amount equal to 8% of the value of the clearances under Rule 57AD of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. CESTAT followed its earlier decision in the assessee's own case and the Supreme Court ratio relied on there, and held that the identical demand was not sustainable. The lower appellate authority's order setting aside the demand was affirmed, and the connected cross-objection was disposed of. en-us Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:39:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195714 Blast furnace gas cleared without payment of duty under an exemption notification was the subject of the dispute while the assessee was availing CENVAT credit. The Revenue sought to recover an amount equal to 8% of the value of the clearances under Rule 57AD of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. CESTAT followed its earlier decision in the assessee's own case and the Supreme Court ratio relied on there, and held that the identical demand was not sustainable. The lower appellate authority's order setting aside the demand was affirmed, and the connected cross-objection was disposed of. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195714