<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1570 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195715</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment proceedings under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, based on reasonable grounds to believe income had escaped assessment. It affirmed the addition of unexplained cash credit under Section 68, rejecting the claim of genuine long-term capital gain. The tribunal found the transactions to be bogus accommodation entries, supporting the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)&#039;s decision and dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:39:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1570 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195715</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment proceedings under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, based on reasonable grounds to believe income had escaped assessment. It affirmed the addition of unexplained cash credit under Section 68, rejecting the claim of genuine long-term capital gain. The tribunal found the transactions to be bogus accommodation entries, supporting the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)&#039;s decision and dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>