<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1645 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195700</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT (A)&#039;s order for assessment year 2008-2009 due to the tax effect being below Rs. 3 lakhs and not including education cess. The Tribunal held that tax effect should be calculated without including cess, following a judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was deemed not maintainable and dismissed. The Cross Objection filed by the assessee in support of the CIT (A)&#039;s order was also dismissed as a result.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 14:10:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1645 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195700</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT (A)&#039;s order for assessment year 2008-2009 due to the tax effect being below Rs. 3 lakhs and not including education cess. The Tribunal held that tax effect should be calculated without including cess, following a judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was deemed not maintainable and dismissed. The Cross Objection filed by the assessee in support of the CIT (A)&#039;s order was also dismissed as a result.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>