<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 829 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the ld. CIT(A) in both issues, dismissing the appeal of the Revenue on 27.2.2013. The disallowance of deduction under section 80IC on capital introduced by partners and interest on unsecured loans was rejected, emphasizing the lack of necessity for interest payment on capital contribution and unsecured loans to increase profits under Section 80IA(10).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 12:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 829 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the ld. CIT(A) in both issues, dismissing the appeal of the Revenue on 27.2.2013. The disallowance of deduction under section 80IC on capital introduced by partners and interest on unsecured loans was rejected, emphasizing the lack of necessity for interest payment on capital contribution and unsecured loans to increase profits under Section 80IA(10).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>