<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 463 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350584</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal challenging the addition under section 68 of the IT Act. The Tribunal found the assessee had proven the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of creditors, shifting the burden to the Assessing Officer. Lack of conclusive evidence against the genuineness of cash creditors led to the dismissal of the department&#039;s arguments. The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the lack of substantial proof for accommodation entries. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, favoring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 463 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350584</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal challenging the addition under section 68 of the IT Act. The Tribunal found the assessee had proven the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of creditors, shifting the burden to the Assessing Officer. Lack of conclusive evidence against the genuineness of cash creditors led to the dismissal of the department&#039;s arguments. The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the lack of substantial proof for accommodation entries. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, favoring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>