<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 446 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350567</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of depreciation claimed by the company on a motor car registered in the director&#039;s name. Despite registration details, the Tribunal deemed the company as the de facto owner due to financial involvement and business use, allowing the depreciation claim of Rs. 2,55,051 and deleting the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 446 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350567</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of depreciation claimed by the company on a motor car registered in the director&#039;s name. Despite registration details, the Tribunal deemed the company as the de facto owner due to financial involvement and business use, allowing the depreciation claim of Rs. 2,55,051 and deleting the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>