<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 438 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350559</link>
    <description>A transferable DFIA covering the description, value and quantity of imported Apple Juice Concentrate entitled the importer to duty-free clearance, and customs could not insist on proof of actual use of the input in the exported product where the exemption notification did not impose that condition. The communication of the Principal Commissioner&#039;s decision was treated as an appealable adjudicatory decision, so the appeal was maintainable. The earlier ruling introducing an actual-use requirement was held inapplicable after the later judicial pronouncement quashing that condition. The DFIA benefit was therefore allowed, subject to the required FSSAI clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 438 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350559</link>
      <description>A transferable DFIA covering the description, value and quantity of imported Apple Juice Concentrate entitled the importer to duty-free clearance, and customs could not insist on proof of actual use of the input in the exported product where the exemption notification did not impose that condition. The communication of the Principal Commissioner&#039;s decision was treated as an appealable adjudicatory decision, so the appeal was maintainable. The earlier ruling introducing an actual-use requirement was held inapplicable after the later judicial pronouncement quashing that condition. The DFIA benefit was therefore allowed, subject to the required FSSAI clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>