<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 436 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350557</link>
    <description>Rough aluminium castings cleared without machining remained classifiable under Chapter 76 because they had not yet acquired the essential characteristics of finished machine parts. As further machining, turning, drilling and tapping were still required before the goods could function as stator plates in a Magneto Assembly, they could not be treated as parts of machinery under Chapter 85. The classification as castings was therefore sustained, and the associated duty demand, interest and penalty could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 436 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350557</link>
      <description>Rough aluminium castings cleared without machining remained classifiable under Chapter 76 because they had not yet acquired the essential characteristics of finished machine parts. As further machining, turning, drilling and tapping were still required before the goods could function as stator plates in a Magneto Assembly, they could not be treated as parts of machinery under Chapter 85. The classification as castings was therefore sustained, and the associated duty demand, interest and penalty could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>