https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350549 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order confirming demands and penalties related to irregular cenvat credit, central excise duty, and penalty imposition. The penalty on the Accounts Officer was dropped due to insufficient evidence of involvement in excisable goods liable for confiscation. The appellant's challenges regarding burning loss, corrosion impact on weight loss of scrap, and procedural errors in excise duty payment were dismissed. The Tribunal found no flaws in the impugned order and upheld the decision, dismissing the appellant's appeal. en-us Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350549 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order confirming demands and penalties related to irregular cenvat credit, central excise duty, and penalty imposition. The penalty on the Accounts Officer was dropped due to insufficient evidence of involvement in excisable goods liable for confiscation. The appellant's challenges regarding burning loss, corrosion impact on weight loss of scrap, and procedural errors in excise duty payment were dismissed. The Tribunal found no flaws in the impugned order and upheld the decision, dismissing the appellant's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350549