https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350548 The Tribunal partially rejected and allowed the appeal, confirming the unaddressed amount while remanding the matter for further examination based on the evidence presented. The rejection solely based on non-rectification was deemed improper, leading to a remand for additional scrutiny by the original adjudicating authority. The appellant's plea for unavailed credit was contested and not entertained due to timing issues. The judgment addresses issues of denial of Cenvat Credit, rectification of invoices, evidence submission, and rejection of the appeal, offering a comprehensive overview of the legal proceedings and outcomes. en-us Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jan 2018 10:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350548 The Tribunal partially rejected and allowed the appeal, confirming the unaddressed amount while remanding the matter for further examination based on the evidence presented. The rejection solely based on non-rectification was deemed improper, leading to a remand for additional scrutiny by the original adjudicating authority. The appellant's plea for unavailed credit was contested and not entertained due to timing issues. The judgment addresses issues of denial of Cenvat Credit, rectification of invoices, evidence submission, and rejection of the appeal, offering a comprehensive overview of the legal proceedings and outcomes. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350548