https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350546 The Tribunal remanded the case for a fresh order due to the lack of discussion on Event Management Service nexus and refund computation inconsistencies in the impugned order. The Tribunal considered Event Management Service as an 'input service' and directed the original authority to issue a reasoned order correction within two months, emphasizing the necessity of a decision in line with legal precedents and correcting observed inconsistencies for subsequent periods. en-us Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350546 The Tribunal remanded the case for a fresh order due to the lack of discussion on Event Management Service nexus and refund computation inconsistencies in the impugned order. The Tribunal considered Event Management Service as an 'input service' and directed the original authority to issue a reasoned order correction within two months, emphasizing the necessity of a decision in line with legal precedents and correcting observed inconsistencies for subsequent periods. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350546