<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 421 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350542</link>
    <description>The court upheld the adjudication that the imported goods were misdeclared as scrap when they were actually usable pipes. The duty levy, confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty under the Customs Act were considered appropriate based on the misdeclaration and the value of the goods. The appeal was dismissed entirely, affirming the original decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 11:01:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 421 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350542</link>
      <description>The court upheld the adjudication that the imported goods were misdeclared as scrap when they were actually usable pipes. The duty levy, confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty under the Customs Act were considered appropriate based on the misdeclaration and the value of the goods. The appeal was dismissed entirely, affirming the original decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>